How we compare
Structured beats plausible.
A chatbot writes a fluent answer. GRADE enforces the spec, then writes the answer — and shows the line it came from. This is a category comparison, not a callout of any one tool.
The categories
| GRADE | Chatbot | Vector search | Spreadsheet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enforces a hard spec exactly | ||||
| Same screen result every time | ||||
| Explains every elimination | ||||
| Quotes your own data sheet | ||||
| Won't invent a product | ||||
| Keeps the human as approver |
We tested the chatbots
We didn't assert this — we measured it, against the strongest chatbot on the same raw data sheets a rep works from.
Why the difference is structural
The categories above differ in where the decision lives. In a chatbot, the model decides. In vector search, a similarity score decides. In GRADE, the model never decides at all.
The honest section
When not to use GRADE
If any of these is you, GRADE is the wrong tool, and we would rather say so now.
- Your specifications are not published in data sheets. If the numbers only exist in someone's head or an internal system, we cannot screen on them.
- You need field service, formulation development, or lab work. We answer inbound inquiries. We do not visit plants.
- Your inquiries are relationship-led rather than specification-led. If customers call and ask "what should I use," with no stated requirements, there is nothing to screen against.
- A general assistant already handles your catalogue well enough. Smaller catalogues sometimes do not need this.
This is not about team size. A small team gets real value from GRADE too.
See the difference
Screen the same inquiry both ways.
Paste one on the home page and watch GRADE enforce the spec — then ask a chatbot the same thing and compare.